Close Menu
  • Home
  • Current Affairs
  • Education
  • Entertainment
  • Finance
  • Health & Fitness
  • Lifestyle
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Tech & Gadgets
  • Travel

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

What's Hot

Intel hits the brakes on its automotive business, and layoffs have started

June 26, 2025

White House to limit intelligence sharing with Congress after leak of early Iran report

June 26, 2025

Funding of Olympic sports a potential bargaining chip as NCAA seeks antitrust help

June 26, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Threads
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact us
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Top10Kinstra – Discover the Best in Tech, Health, Finance, Travel & Lifestyle
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • Current Affairs
  • Education
  • Entertainment
  • Finance
  • Health & Fitness
  • Lifestyle
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Tech & Gadgets
  • Travel
Top10Kinstra – Discover the Best in Tech, Health, Finance, Travel & Lifestyle
Home » Supreme Court rules for South Carolina in its bid to defund Planned Parenthood
Politics

Supreme Court rules for South Carolina in its bid to defund Planned Parenthood

adminBy adminJune 26, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Threads Bluesky Copy Link


WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled for South Carolina in its effort to defund Planned Parenthood, concluding that individual Medicaid patients cannot sue to enforce their right to pick a medical provider.

The court held in a 6-3 ruling along ideological lines, with the conservative justices in the majority, that the federal law in question does not allow people who are enrolled in the Medicaid program to file such claims against the state.

The ruling written by Justice Neil Gorsuch is a boost to the state’s effort to prevent Planned Parenthood from receiving funding through Medicaid, a federal program for low-income people that is administered by the states, because it prevents individual patients from enforcing their right to choose their preferred health care provider.

“Congress knows how to give a grantee clear and unambiguous notice that, if it accepts federal funds, it may face private suits asserting an individual right to choose a medical provider,” Gorsuch wrote.

But, he added, “that is not the law we have.”

Federal funding for abortion is already banned, but conservatives have long targeted Planned Parenthood, which provides reproductive health services including abortions where allowed, for any funding it receives even if it is for other health care-related services.

They argue that even nonabortion related funding that flows to Planned Parenthood would help it carry out its broader agenda that favors abortion rights.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented along with her two liberal colleagues, writing in her opinion that the decision was part of a long line of rulings that has undermined the 1871 Civil Rights Act that was enacted after the Civil War to allow people to sue for civil rights violations.

“South Carolina asks us to hollow out that provision so that the state can evade liability for violating the rights of its Medicaid recipients to choose their own doctors,” she said. “The court abides South Carolina’s request. I would not.”

The state’s efforts to defund Planned Parenthood came before the Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, overturned the landmark Roe v. Wade abortion rights ruling in 2022.

South Carolina now has a six-week abortion ban, meaning abortions are rare in the state.

Planned Parenthood has facilities in Charleston and Columbia that provide abortion care in compliance with the new law, as well as other health care services, including contraception, cancer screenings and pregnancy testing.

In 2018, Gov. Henry McMaster issued an executive order that prohibited Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, the local affiliate of the national group, from providing family planning services under Medicaid.

Julie Edwards, a Medicaid-eligible patient who wants to use Planned Parenthood, joined a lawsuit filed by the group, saying that under federal civil rights law she could enforce her rights in court.

A federal judge ruled in her favor, and after lengthy litigation, the Supreme Court agreed to weigh in.



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest Bluesky Threads Tumblr Telegram Email
admin
  • Website

Related Posts

White House to limit intelligence sharing with Congress after leak of early Iran report

June 26, 2025

Pete Hegseth scolds news media for reporting initial Iran damage assessment from U.S. airstrikes

June 26, 2025

DOJ coordinated with Texas AG to kill Texas Dream Act, Trump official says

June 26, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

Diddy trial judge tosses juror as prosecutors lay out more evidence

June 17, 20251 Views

Prosecutor reveals chilling details of attacks on Minnesota lawmakers

June 17, 20251 Views

On 10-year anniversary of legal gay marriage in U.S., Obergefell says fight isn’t over

June 26, 20250 Views
Don't Miss

Funding of Olympic sports a potential bargaining chip as NCAA seeks antitrust help

By adminJune 26, 2025

College sports leaders seeking antitrust and other protections from Congress have a potential bargaining chip:…

An explosion and ensuing stampede kill 29 children in a Central African Republic school

June 26, 2025

Supreme Court to decide birthright citizenship, other cases

June 26, 2025

Most support religious chaplains in public schools, AP-NORC poll says

June 26, 2025
Most Popular

Jeff Ross to make his Broadway debut this summer

June 18, 20251 Views

What to know about the next James Bond movie

June 26, 20250 Views

A look at ‘lost albums’ from artists through the decades

June 26, 20250 Views
Our Picks

Intel hits the brakes on its automotive business, and layoffs have started

June 26, 2025

White House to limit intelligence sharing with Congress after leak of early Iran report

June 26, 2025

Funding of Olympic sports a potential bargaining chip as NCAA seeks antitrust help

June 26, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact us
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2025 top10kinstra. Designed by top10kinstra.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.